Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Biplane down 09/11/07

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Biplane down

    What?! What did he say?
    Was the RP-5 a radical design? I've never seen any pictures of it. I saw a picture of another Rose plane with twin tandem V-8's.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Biplane down

      The fuselage was pretty straight forward, but it had very thin wings that were short chord wise as well. I am not sure what the stall / landing speeds were on that thing, but it had to be a handfull when everything was working correctly.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Biplane down

        did it use that prop that looked a little like a used attic fan also?

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Biplane down

          Originally posted by skybolt2003
          did it use that prop that looked a little like a used attic fan also?
          Nope....rather conventional two blader. It was built and raced before the LIPPS props that Phantom, and Miss G are using.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Biplane down

            Originally posted by Dash
            Well, there's a couple of things that would help the stall speed. The plane was light weight and that directly translates to a lower stall speed. Also, the pilot was a fighter pilot from what I understand. I'm sure landing at 120 knots would be more than what the biplane landed at. There's also a part 23 requirement for landing speeds, and although this is not a part 23 airplane, it's probably not too far off in speeds. I'd say 70 knot max landing speed. Your day 1 pilot can pretty much deal with that.
            It was experimental so part 23 doesn't apply. who knows what it would land at. think about how short coupled a plane like that is, and then imagine how pitch sensitive it would be.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Biplane down

              Originally posted by Race5
              Nope....rather conventional two blader. It was built and raced before the LIPPS props that Phantom, and Miss G are using.
              I have some pics of this plane and its prop, the pilot claimed it was an unducted fan type prop, its diameter was very small. The owner of Phantom, a tall slender and very gracious man also said it was an unducted fan. I will get these pics devoloped today and scan one in.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Biplane down

                Oh my god, this thread has caused me YET ANOTHER panic attack....

                Pretty please Wayne, can you change the the thread title? Maybe, '9/11/07 Biplane accident discussion'?

                My wife screamed from the other room yesterday when _she_ got snookered... and I just did again, for the 3rd time..

                -mosquito

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Biplane down

                  Originally posted by Bob
                  I have some pics of this plane and its prop, the pilot claimed it was an unducted fan type prop, its diameter was very small. The owner of Phantom, a tall slender and very gracious man also said it was an unducted fan. I will get these pics devoloped today and scan one in.
                  That sounds like what I saw on the other Rose racer. I'd love to see the pictures you have.
                  Tom Aberle of Phantom is a great guy. He's got that easy unassuming confidence you'd expect in a racer. (I've known him for a long time - learned to fly with his dad, so I'm a little biased I guess)

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X