-
10-18-2011, 12:13 PM
#101
Re: ROLLS-ROYCE CRECY
-
10-19-2011, 06:13 PM
#102
Re: ROLLS-ROYCE CRECY
-
02-17-2012, 03:26 PM
#103
Re: ROLLS-ROYCE CRECY
Ok, ok , but why write " is invented by a German scientist."????
http://www.tzhealth.com/medical-devi...ynamometer.htm
And you do not need to share the head of the block, because the valves go up and not down.
Regards Andrew
-
02-21-2012, 06:46 AM
#104
Re: ROLLS-ROYCE CRECY
I was with my friends in the Museum of aviation again. "I'd like him to show this demo in which the effect of the vacuum State at the top of the wings, which blows the wind from the fan, the ball is sucked in by a transparent tube
provided in the middle of the wings and a peg that pops up on the wing.
Doing this experience again, so your friend can see it, I am surprised that the ball a is NOT sucked in tube!!
It is that this experience has been vandalized, and the ball is sucked on
Vandalized based on this, with a transparent tube to the bottom was several times the seeds.
But this was not the reason for the lack of vacuum in the tube.
After arrives home, thoroughly by looking at the about the well running the show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb8IF...layer_embedded
I noticed that the tube on the film extends over the upper surface of the wings have 70 mm
The vandalizet show the tube was brought down to equality with the upper surface of the wing.
And this was the main reason for the lack of vacuum in the tube !
Simply air her upper surface of the wing, when it encounters a simple hole in the wing, just get it and seeking to keep the pipes, eliminates any vacuum in it.!!
That is, that the ball could be the suck by the vacuum arising at the top of the wings, in this case the pipe must extend over the upper surface of the wing by about 70 mm !!!
When this tube does not extend, this does not transmit its down this vacuum, even in the smallest degree.
Why is this, explain the following drawings:



Yes so we are one of the one cases where due to vandalism, we fully the specificities of of the Red Baron Windmill...
According to estimates, the surface of the wing of a 100 m square, with a wind speed of 30 km\/h can produce approximately 750 KG lift.
To get 100 KG of thrust of the propeller to the ultralight trike, the engine must have a power of about 50 KW
You can take also denied that the 100 KG over da US 50 KW electrical Dynamo.
Which had managed to seize the entire lift such 100 m ^ 2 wings which is 750 KG, a power Dynamo would be 300 KW.
The Windmill of the Red Baron 100 m x 30 m = 3000 m ^ 2 and this will give us the 9000 KW.
Now you can build 10 such wings one above with which 30000 m ^ 2 = 90 MW.
No and now depends on how many% of this theoretical power we capture this lift and exchange it into electrical current.
Regards Andrew
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/wrong1.html
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/wrong3.html
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/presar.html
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/shape.html
-
02-24-2012, 03:22 AM
#105
Re: ROLLS-ROYCE CRECY
A can so ...

Andrew
-
02-28-2012, 07:47 AM
#106
Re: ROLLS-ROYCE CRECY
And in the meantime since the formation of the ideas, changes a lot. For example, go beyond the "magic circle of the cylinder" was the hardest thing.
When I discovered it, a new type of timing, was the new 4 stroke engine:

Regards Andrew
-
03-01-2012, 03:18 AM
#107
Re: ROLLS-ROYCE CRECY
My 6 cylinder boxer..

Can have two times less cubic capacity, because that is two times smaller turnover at the flywheel.
Regards Andrew
-
03-12-2012, 04:25 AM
#108
Re: ROLLS-ROYCE CRECY
I think the era of steam comes to an end. At most in obsolete nuclear power plants will be still used. 
Half supports the engine has one very big advantage. Piston not friction on the walls of the "cylinder""Only the seals frictions cylinder
Thanks to these properties, the engine may be running on ... the coal dust.
Rudolf Diesel's first engine was built just on the coal dust, but unfortunately zacierał is at work. In the case of half rotate, will not look any login problems.Simply does not have any large surface friction


Only the directory should be chosen for personal seal. Each round you can straighten lines, of course, resistant to coal dust.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6hwiz0QXsE
http://www.passerotti.com.pl/page/pol/download/549P.pdf
Regards Andrew 
-
03-17-2012, 04:29 PM
#109
Re: ROLLS-ROYCE CRECY
[quote name='Wuzak' post='5587386' date='Mar 15 2012, 08:26']Will sufficient heat be generated in the exhaust to be used ina combined cycle situation?[/quote]
Yes, combined cycle, but also the latest trends ...
http://www.gizmag.com/thermoelectric...ove-mpg/10928/
And since it has to work at the coal face powder (same what they use today's power plants for combustion in boilers).
can seals with carbon, similar to the scrubbing of electric motors
http://hariramco.com/carbon-brushes.html
http://www.dpaonthenet.net/article/4...mpressors.aspx
Star engines were characterized biggest always force density


Below picture of the star half rotate around 10 (40) with "cylinders". for the transparency of the picture one can see only 3 additional "cylinders" more than is at the animated film.
One can also see dimensions of the whole of the engine in the assumption that every cylinder has such dimensions for the picture half rotate with the set connecting rod of the Sulzer D= engine of 900 mm and stroke 2500 mm .

So 10 (40) "cylindrical" engine half rotate about the same working capacity in comparing to the Sulzer 10 engine cylindrical on the picture below .
Sulzer: 10 Cylinders 20 m long , 15 m hight , 1500 Ton weight
Half rotate star : 10(40) "Cylinders" 4,5 m diameter , 4,5 m long
about 70 ton weight.

And most importantly.. Since in the engine half rotate mass innertia are several times Sulzer smaller than in the engine, engine half rotate can work with the much greater rotation speed.
Slzer : 102 RPM 60 000 KW
Half rotate 250 RPM 150 000 KW
In same intake work volume .
And now, the efficiency of the engine, due to the friction of the walls of the cylinder to rise about 5%. That is, it is the most efficient machine for the heat, whose efficiency exceeds 50% of the.
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2249
Regards Andrew
-
03-17-2012, 11:24 PM
#110
Re: ROLLS-ROYCE CRECY
Power problem solved right here:


And if that's not enough power, one can always uprate:


Who knows? With technology this advanced, the sky is the limit as far as powerplant upgrades go...:

Last edited by AirDOGGe; 03-17-2012 at 11:27 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules