Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Seafury A/C CW vs. CCW radial installation Q?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Seafury A/C CW vs. CCW radial installation Q?

    With out any one getting their slides rule out.... pls. esplain what tweeks need to be done... fuse, wings, washout , etc. when replacing the sleeve motoers with opposite prop rotation cyclones. only .10 cent words please

    BMarsh

  • #2
    Re: Seafury A/C CW vs. CCW radial installation Q?

    No big changes Bill. The Sea Fury has no offset in the vertical fin so it's not a factor. It requires a custom engine mount to adapt the American engine to the airframe. The stock Sea Fury used a firewall mounted accessory drive to run the air and hydraulic pumps, etc. This goes away as they are bolted directly to the new engine.

    Ken

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Seafury A/C CW vs. CCW radial installation Q?

      Originally posted by Ken Dwelle
      No big changes Bill. The Sea Fury has no offset in the vertical fin so it's not a factor. It requires a custom engine mount to adapt the American engine to the airframe. The stock Sea Fury used a firewall mounted accessory drive to run the air and hydraulic pumps, etc. This goes away as they are bolted directly to the new engine.

      Ken
      I did not know that! How come no offset in the design?
      "And if they stare, just let them burn their eyes on your moving."

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Seafury A/C CW vs. CCW radial installation Q?

        Thanks for a great reply and explanation Ken thats all new information

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Seafury A/C CW vs. CCW radial installation Q?

          It requires different Trim settings also, Right? or is that too obvious?...D.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Seafury A/C CW vs. CCW radial installation Q?

            There is only about 85 lbs. difference in weight(the 3350 being heavier), so the Weight and Balance is no problem, and as for no offset to the tail, the rudder trim tab is more than adequate to handle the takeoff torque. Hawker had always built nice, large, stable, well-handling aircraft and by the time the Sea Fury was perfected, they had a great performing aircraft that was pleasant to handle, not squirrelly like some other fighters. At least, if left in stock configuration. With the availability of the Wright engines, spares and parts, it was a logical step to install a 3350 in lieu of the Centaurus. The sleeve valve engines must be a nightmare to work on, I imagine. For more info on the Sea Fury, there is a great book by Kev Darling, #37 in the WarbirdTech series of books - check it out.

            Comment


            • #7
              you forgot one thing....

              Originally posted by Ken Dwelle
              No big changes Bill. The Sea Fury has no offset in the vertical fin so it's not a factor. It requires a custom engine mount to adapt the American engine to the airframe. The stock Sea Fury used a firewall mounted accessory drive to run the air and hydraulic pumps, etc. This goes away as they are bolted directly to the new engine.

              Ken
              LARGE BAGS full of money!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Seafury A/C CW vs. CCW radial installation Q?

                Originally posted by David E. Wells
                It requires different Trim settings also, Right? or is that too obvious?...D.
                Right rudder trim would be in order for takeoff! The tab has equal travel to the port and starboard, 5/8" +/- 1/16.

                Ken

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Seafury A/C CW vs. CCW radial installation Q?

                  Who knew.....

                  thanks all.

                  Bmarsh

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X